Re: [GENERAL] Serial/sequence problem

2008-11-25 Thread Sam Mason
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 05:39:49PM +0930, Michael Hall wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 08:26:55AM +0100, A. Kretschmer wrote: > > Set the sequence to the new value, 3636+9, via > > setval('your_sequence', 3636+9) > > I'll re-import the data with DEFAULT in the id (SERIAL) column, > hopefully new

Re: [GENERAL] Serial/sequence problem

2008-11-25 Thread Michael Hall
> The 3636 INSERT-Statements contains a fix value for the ID-Column, > right? Thats wrong, omit the id-column and value or use simply 'default' for > it. That's right. I thought that might be the case. > > - how can I rectify the situation? > Set the sequence to the new value, 3636+9, via > s

Re: [GENERAL] Serial/sequence problem

2008-11-24 Thread A. Kretschmer
am Tue, dem 25.11.2008, um 16:41:43 +0930 mailte Mike Hall folgendes: > I have just imported 3636 rows into a PG database table (PG 8.1 on CentOS 5.2 > ... the default). > The rows were imported using separate INSERT statements for each row. All OK > so far. > > After having had a few attempts

[GENERAL] Serial/sequence problem

2008-11-24 Thread Mike Hall
I have just imported 3636 rows into a PG database table (PG 8.1 on CentOS 5.2 ... the default). The rows were imported using separate INSERT statements for each row. All OK so far. After having had a few attempts at inserting new test rows (which all inserted OK), I notice that the last_value c