Re: [GENERAL] Seq Scan but I think it should be Index Scan

2005-10-26 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 06:55:54PM -0700, Edoceo Lists wrote: > I'm thinking that my queries are not using indexs correctly and > therefore taking longer to complete than they should. Index scans aren't necessarily faster than sequential scans: if the query reads a significant amount of the table

[GENERAL] Seq Scan but I think it should be Index Scan

2005-10-26 Thread Edoceo Lists
So the details of it: I'm using PostgreSQL 8.0.3 on a Gentoo kernel 2.6.12 on a P4/2.8G+HT proc, with kernel RAID0 on some SATA drives and 1G RAM. Don't know the bus speed. I'm thinking that my queries are not using indexs correctly and therefore taking longer to complete than they should. I'