On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Joseph Kregloh
> wrote:
>
>> With my dataset I have been able to take advantage of the L2ARC.
>> Currently using about 80GB on ARC and 260GB on L2ARC. With the ARC
>> currently having the greater Hit ratio.
>
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Joseph Kregloh
wrote:
> With my dataset I have been able to take advantage of the L2ARC. Currently
> using about 80GB on ARC and 260GB on L2ARC. With the ARC currently having
> the greater Hit ratio.
>
Did you tell postgres that the effective_cache_size = Shared
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Joseph Kregloh
> wrote:
>
>> We recently built a new server for our Production database. The machine
>> is top of the line with 128GB of RAM, dual E5-2650. We also included NVME
>> drives for ZIL and L2ARC. Cur
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Joseph Kregloh
wrote:
> We recently built a new server for our Production database. The machine is
> top of the line with 128GB of RAM, dual E5-2650. We also included NVME
> drives for ZIL and L2ARC. Currently we have 3 zpools. First one holds the
> FreeBSD install
We recently built a new server for our Production database. The machine is
top of the line with 128GB of RAM, dual E5-2650. We also included NVME
drives for ZIL and L2ARC. Currently we have 3 zpools. First one holds the
FreeBSD install. Second holds the jails, and third holds all of the
database da
