On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 12:49, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 11:49, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 11:20:41AM -0500, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> >
> > > I have a view that used union all to merge three tables together. I was
> > > hoping to create a rule, one for
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 11:49, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 11:20:41AM -0500, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> > I have a view that used union all to merge three tables together. I was
> > hoping to create a rule, one for each table using the WHERE condition of
> > the rule to determin
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 11:20:41AM -0500, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> I have a view that used union all to merge three tables together. I was
> hoping to create a rule, one for each table using the WHERE condition of
> the rule to determine which table gets updated. Is this possible?
See the CREA
I have a view that used union all to merge three tables together. I was
hoping to create a rule, one for each table using the WHERE condition of
the rule to determine which table gets updated. Is this possible?
This is what I have, assume the view here is a merge of three tables
using union all:
