On Monday, March 21, 2016, Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" > writes:
> > On Monday, March 21, 2016, Tom Lane >
> wrote:
> >> What about just discarding the old format entirely, and printing one of
> >> these two things:
> >>
> >> Timestamp (every Ns)
> >>
> >> User Given Title Timestamp (e
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> If I don't hear objections PDQ, I'm going to update the docs and commit
> it like that.
Thanks!
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/m
Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" writes:
> > On Monday, March 21, 2016, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> What about just discarding the old format entirely, and printing one of
> >> these two things:
> >>
> >> Timestamp (every Ns)
> >>
> >> User Given Title Timestamp (every Ns)
>
> > This works for
"David G. Johnston" writes:
> On Monday, March 21, 2016, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What about just discarding the old format entirely, and printing one of
>> these two things:
>>
>> Timestamp (every Ns)
>>
>> User Given Title Timestamp (every Ns)
> This works for me.
If I don't hear objections PDQ,
On Monday, March 21, 2016, Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" > writes:
> > I'll admit it's awkward because it's abbreviated but if someone enters
> > \watch 5 and then sees (5s) in the title I think they can put two and two
> > together.
>
> Where I find this to be awkward is that the format
On Monday, March 21, 2016, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:09 PM, David G. Johnston
> > wrote:
> > On Monday, March 21, 2016, Tom Lane >
> wrote:
> >> "David G. Johnston" > writes:
> >> > I'd rather not omit sleep but removing "Watch every" is fine
> (preferred
> >> > actually), so
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:09 PM, David G. Johnston
wrote:
> On Monday, March 21, 2016, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "David G. Johnston" writes:
>> > I'd rather not omit sleep but removing "Watch every" is fine (preferred
>> > actually), so:
>> > Title Is Here Mon Mar 21 15:05:06 2016 (5s)
>>
>> Meh ..
On Monday, March 21, 2016, Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" > writes:
> > I'd rather not omit sleep but removing "Watch every" is fine (preferred
> > actually), so:
> > Title Is Here Mon Mar 21 15:05:06 2016 (5s)
>
> Meh ... seems a bit awkward to me. Couldn't you include " (5s)" in the
"David G. Johnston" writes:
> I'd rather not omit sleep but removing "Watch every" is fine (preferred
> actually), so:
> Title Is Here Mon Mar 21 15:05:06 2016 (5s)
Meh ... seems a bit awkward to me. Couldn't you include " (5s)" in the
title, if you want that info? If it's variable, you cou
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > Well, the title isn't normally centered, but yeah, that is odd. Yeah,
> > that is odd. Come to think of it, I think I might have expected the
> > title to appear *above* "Watch every %s", not below it. That might
> >
Robert Haas writes:
> Well, the title isn't normally centered, but yeah, that is odd. Yeah,
> that is odd. Come to think of it, I think I might have expected the
> title to appear *above* "Watch every %s", not below it. That might
> decrease the oddness.
AFAICS, it appears *beside* it with thi
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:17 AM, David G. Johnston
wrote:
>> And does everybody agree that this is a desirable change?
>
> Adding the title is desirable. While I'm inclined to bike-shed this
> anything that gets it in I can live with and so I'm content letting the
> author/committer decide where
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
> > And the patch attached gives the following output:
> > With title:
> > =# \watch 1
> > Watch every 1sSun Mar 20 22:28:38 2016
> > popo
> > a
> > ---
> > 1
> > (1 row)
>
Thi
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> And the patch attached gives the following output:
> With title:
> =# \watch 1
> Watch every 1sSun Mar 20 22:28:38 2016
> popo
> a
> ---
> 1
> (1 row)
>
> And without title:
> Watch every 1sSun Mar 20 22:29:31 2016
>
> a
> ---
>
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:40 AM, David G. Johnston
> wrote:
>> Adding -hackers for consideration in the Commitfest.
>
> I don't much like how this patch uses the arbitrary constant 50 in no
> fewer than 5 locations.
>
> Also, it seems like we
David Steele writes:
> On 3/17/16 5:07 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
>> Figured out it had to be added to 2016-09...done
> Hmm ... this patch is currently marked "needs review" in CF 2016-03. Am
> I missing something, should this have been closed?
The message I saw was post-1-March. If it was i
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Steele writes:
>> On 3/17/16 7:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> The message I saw was post-1-March. If it was in fact submitted in
>>> time for 2016-03, then we owe it a review.
>
>> I meant to add the CF record and forgot:
>> https://commitfest
; From: Michael Paquier
> Date: Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:01 AM
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Request - repeat value of \pset title during \watch
> interations
> To: "David G. Johnston"
> Cc: Tom Lane , "pgsql-general@postgresql.org" <
> pgsql-general@postgresq
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:40 AM, David G. Johnston
wrote:
> Adding -hackers for consideration in the Commitfest.
I don't much like how this patch uses the arbitrary constant 50 in no
fewer than 5 locations.
Also, it seems like we could arrange for head_title to be "" rather
than NULL when myopt.
On 3/17/16 7:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Steele writes:
>> On 3/17/16 5:07 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
>>> Figured out it had to be added to 2016-09...done
>
>> Hmm ... this patch is currently marked "needs review" in CF 2016-03. Am
>> I missing something, should this have been closed?
>
>
On 3/17/16 5:07 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
> Figured out it had to be added to 2016-09...done
Hmm ... this patch is currently marked "needs review" in CF 2016-03. Am
I missing something, should this have been closed?
--
-David
da...@pgmasters.net
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pg
On Thursday, March 17, 2016, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Tom Lane > wrote:
> > David Steele > writes:
> >> On 3/17/16 7:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> The message I saw was post-1-March. If it was in fact submitted in
> >>> time for 2016-03, then we owe it a review.
David Steele writes:
> On 3/17/16 7:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The message I saw was post-1-March. If it was in fact submitted in
>> time for 2016-03, then we owe it a review.
> I meant to add the CF record and forgot:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/9/480
> It was added 2016-01-13 by Michael
tion into the title.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Michael Paquier
Date: Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:01 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Request - repeat value of \pset title during \watch
interations
To: "David G. Johnston"
Cc: Tom Lane , "pgsql-general@postgresql.org" &
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 1:55 AM, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > Could you run the following and post the result, please? I have yet to
> > setup a compiled-from-source installation...
> >
> > \pset title 'This is a medium length title'
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 1:55 AM, David G. Johnston wrote:
> Could you run the following and post the result, please? I have yet to
> setup a compiled-from-source installation...
>
> \pset title 'This is a medium length title'
> SELECT repeat('a', 100) \watch 5
>
> It seems fine though I'm curious
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:54 PM, David G. Johnston
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Michael Paquier <
> michael.paqu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:34 AM, David G. Johnston
> >> wrote:
> >> > So
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:54 PM, David G. Johnston
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:34 AM, David G. Johnston
>> wrote:
>> > So how about:
>> >
>> > + snprintf(title, strlen(myopt.title) + 50,
>> > + _("Watch every %lds\t%s\t%s"),
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:34 AM, David G. Johnston
> wrote:
> > So how about:
> >
> > + snprintf(title, strlen(myopt.title) + 50,
> > + _("Watch every %lds\t%s\t%s"),
> > + sleep, head_title, asctime(localtime(&timer)));
>
> I would just
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:34 AM, David G. Johnston
wrote:
> So how about:
>
> + snprintf(title, strlen(myopt.title) + 50,
> + _("Watch every %lds\t%s\t%s"),
> + sleep, head_title, asctime(localtime(&timer)));
I would just keep the timestamp and the title separated so what do you
think about that
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:15 AM, David G. Johnston
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>
> >> "David G. Johnston" writes:
> >> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> >> Perhaps we should re
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:15 AM, David G. Johnston
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> "David G. Johnston" writes:
>> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> >> Perhaps we should replace the "Watch every Ns" text by the user-given
>> >> title if a title
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" writes:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Perhaps we should replace the "Watch every Ns" text by the user-given
> >> title if a title has been set? That would conserve screen space.
>
> > The extra
"David G. Johnston" writes:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Perhaps we should replace the "Watch every Ns" text by the user-given
>> title if a title has been set? That would conserve screen space.
> âThe extra line doesn't both me and given the length of the timestamp I
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:36 AM, David G. Johnston
> wrote:
> > When executing a query using \watch in psql the first execution of the
> query
> > includes "Title is [...]" when \pset title is in use. Subsequent
> executions
> > do not.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:36 AM, David G. Johnston
> > wrote:
> >> When executing a query using \watch in psql the first execution of the
> query
> >> includes "Title is [...]" when \pset title is in use. Subsequent
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:36 AM, David G. Johnston
> wrote:
>> When executing a query using \watch in psql the first execution of the query
>> includes "Title is [...]" when \pset title is in use. Subsequent executions
>> do not. Once that first display goes off-screen
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:36 AM, David G. Johnston
wrote:
> When executing a query using \watch in psql the first execution of the query
> includes "Title is [...]" when \pset title is in use. Subsequent executions
> do not. Once that first display goes off-screen the information in the
> title
When executing a query using \watch in psql the first execution of the
query includes "Title is [...]" when \pset title is in use. Subsequent
executions do not. Once that first display goes off-screen the information
in the title is no longer readily accessible. If using \watch for a
long-runnin
39 matches
Mail list logo
