On Nov 26, 2012 7:15 AM, "Tom Lane" wrote:
>
> Hari Babu writes:
> > When I was trying get the source code from ftp source, I found that
> > 9.2.0beta1 and 9.2beta1 are pointing to
> > 9.2.0beta1 source code. Is it intentional or Is there any source code
> > difference between 9.2.0beta1 and 9.2b
Hari Babu writes:
> When I was trying get the source code from ftp source, I found that
> 9.2.0beta1 and 9.2beta1 are pointing to
> 9.2.0beta1 source code. Is it intentional or Is there any source code
> difference between 9.2.0beta1 and 9.2beta1?
We do not use version strings like "9.2.0beta1".
Hi,
When I was trying get the source code from ftp source, I found that
9.2.0beta1 and 9.2beta1 are pointing to
9.2.0beta1 source code. Is it intentional or Is there any source code
difference between 9.2.0beta1 and 9.2beta1?
Regards,
Hari babu.
