On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 04:33:42PM -0020, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If the work that Alfred has done is as effective as he claims, then
> there must be a *REALLY* good reason why it isn't being included.
Isn't 7.1 in a code freeze?
That seems like a *REALLY* good reason not to include such a ch
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010428 21:44] wrote:
> I am rather staggered by a developer considering it necessary to
> attempt to cooerce the core development team into including a patch.
I'm assuming you refer to the updated page at:
http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/vacfix/
> If th
Totally agreed.
It could just be from a lack of people's time to do things, or I wonder
if Alfred's patch is doing things which might not be beneficial?
(Maybe there have been decisions on a better way to get it done, but it
just hasn't been implemented yet).
I'm curious also.
Regards and bes
I am rather staggered by a developer considering it necessary to
attempt to cooerce the core development team into including a patch.
If the work that Alfred has done is as effective as he claims, then
there must be a *REALLY* good reason why it isn't being included.
I don't want to start any fo
