Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation

2000-07-20 Thread Karel Zak
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Thursday 20 July 2000, at 10 h 0, the keyboard of Karel Zak > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And what is a "large database"? 1, 5 .. 10Gb? If yes, (IMHO) the PostgreSQL > > is good choice. > > Even on Linux? I'm studying a database pro

Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation

2000-07-20 Thread Jules Bean
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 10:35:41AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Thursday 20 July 2000, at 10 h 0, the keyboard of Karel Zak > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And what is a "large database"? 1, 5 .. 10Gb? If yes, (IMHO) the PostgreSQL > > is good choice. > > Even on Linux? I'm stud

Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation

2000-07-20 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Thursday 20 July 2000, at 10 h 0, the keyboard of Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And what is a "large database"? 1, 5 .. 10Gb? If yes, (IMHO) the PostgreSQL > is good choice. Even on Linux? I'm studying a database project where the raw data is 10 to 20 Gb (it will be in several t

[GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation

2000-07-20 Thread Karel Zak
>what about performances with postgreSQL and large databases, >the object size limitation (8192 bytes) is really not acceptable for this Now you can change this limit in config.h, the possible range is 8Kb - 32Kb. In new 7.1 version will this limit dead forever (see TOAST project).