"=?utf-8?B?Q2F0YWxpbih1eCkgTS4gQm9pZQ==?=" writes:
> I hope I make myself clear now: I want a possibility to add a CHECK that will
> be used for partitioning without having to read all data for validation.
Basically, this is unlikely to be accepted, because it does not conform
with the project's
Hello.
Now I understand why I was not clear.
From what I understood, NOT VALID feature will not allow for the CHECK to be
used in queries. So, for partitioning, my goal, is critical that the CHECK
condition to be used.
I hope I make myself clear now: I want a possibility to add a CHECK that wi
Hello.
Thanks for the answer.
I really want to avoid reading the whole table. It is too expensive, and with
the proposed feature will be not needed. I think is much faster to forcefully
add the check if you know the range of data.
What do you think?
--
Catalin(ux) M. BOIE
http://kernel.embedr
