At 12:41 PM -0400 9/5/07, Owen Hartnett wrote:
At 11:32 AM -0400 9/5/07, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Owen Hartnett wrote:
I've been able to turn on statement logging (I've set log_statement to
'all'), but it doesn't seem to show the begin transaction - commit
At 11:32 AM -0400 9/5/07, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Owen Hartnett wrote:
I've been able to turn on statement logging (I've set log_statement to
'all'), but it doesn't seem to show the begin transaction - commit -
rollback statements. Is there another way to
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> In PG 8.2 I'd agree, but older versions are not so good about logging
>> execution of prepared statements. What's the server version exactly,
>> and is there any indication of use of prepared statements in the log?
> Humm, but can yo
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Owen Hartnett wrote:
> >> I've been able to turn on statement logging (I've set log_statement to
> >> 'all'), but it doesn't seem to show the begin transaction - commit -
> >> rollback statements. Is there another way to have them
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Owen Hartnett wrote:
>> I've been able to turn on statement logging (I've set log_statement to
>> 'all'), but it doesn't seem to show the begin transaction - commit -
>> rollback statements. Is there another way to have them show up in the log?
> If
Owen Hartnett wrote:
> At 10:14 AM -0400 8/28/07, Owen Hartnett wrote:
>> At 7:05 PM -0400 8/27/07, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Owen Hartnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I assign the transaction object to each of the commands, but it seems
that some tables will get updated, even when I call rol
At 10:14 AM -0400 8/28/07, Owen Hartnett wrote:
At 7:05 PM -0400 8/27/07, Tom Lane wrote:
Owen Hartnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I assign the transaction object to each of the commands, but it seems
that some tables will get updated, even when I call rollback. Is
something I'm calling se
At 7:05 PM -0400 8/27/07, Tom Lane wrote:
Owen Hartnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I assign the transaction object to each of the commands, but it seems
that some tables will get updated, even when I call rollback. Is
something I'm calling secretly calling "commit" somewhere?
Dunno anythi
Owen Hartnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I assign the transaction object to each of the commands, but it seems
> that some tables will get updated, even when I call rollback. Is
> something I'm calling secretly calling "commit" somewhere?
Dunno anything about vb.net, but this sounds like an
Maybe someone here can figure it out. Everything updates fine with
this code, except where there's an exception, it's not rolling back
by the transaction. What I'm trying to do:
Begin a transaction
Do the update, insert, delete checks on each of the data tables,
using a different npgsqlcom
Matthijs Melissen wrote:
I want two users to execute the following queries:
1) delete from forum where id = 'A';
1) insert into forum (id, name) values ('A', 'testa');
2) delete from forum where id = 'A';
2) insert into forum (id, name) values ('A', 'testb');
id is a unique key. The numbers de
I want two users to execute the following queries:
1) delete from forum where id = 'A';
1) insert into forum (id, name) values ('A', 'testa');
2) delete from forum where id = 'A';
2) insert into forum (id, name) values ('A', 'testb');
id is a unique key. The numbers designate the user (1 and 2)
12 matches
Mail list logo
