On Aug 23, 2007, at 8:59 , Frank Millman wrote:
It certainly does. Thanks again for all the valuable advice.
Glad you found it helpful. Good luck!
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the po
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>
> On Aug 22, 2007, at 1:02 , Frank Millman wrote:
>
> > I want to store data in a 'tree' form, with a fixed number
> of levels,
> > so that each level has a defined role.
>
Thanks very much for the in-depth response, Michael. Plenty for the little
grey cells to wor
On Aug 22, 2007, at 1:02 , Frank Millman wrote:
I want to store data in a 'tree' form, with a fixed number of
levels, so
that each level has a defined role.
First thought: fixed, predetermined levels, separate tables for each
level. If a more general approach is desired, your options are
Hi all
I have a problem, which I suspect stems from bad design.
If I explain what I am doing, perhaps someone can suggest a better approach.
I want to store data in a 'tree' form, with a fixed number of levels, so
that each level has a defined role.
I have the following (simplified) table -
CR