Re: [GENERAL] Postres.exe Processes Hang

2008-08-18 Thread Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Kim Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Great thanks all. > Can you give me any indication of the performance implications of > setting pooling=false? > Yeap. All the time you would need to connect to postgresql you will have the overhead of tcp connection establ

Re: [GENERAL] Postres.exe Processes Hang

2008-08-18 Thread Kim Robinson
; pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postres.exe Processes Hang On 8/18/08, Magnus Hagander Hi, all! As Magnus said, this is caused by the fact Npgsql does connection pool by default. You can change that by passing pooling=false in your connection string. You can get more info at

Re: [GENERAL] Postres.exe Processes Hang

2008-08-18 Thread Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
On 8/18/08, Magnus Hagander Hi, all! As Magnus said, this is caused by the fact Npgsql does connection pool by default. You can change that by passing pooling=false in your connection string. You can get more info at manual.npgsql.org I hope it helps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kim Robinson w

Re: [GENERAL] Postres.exe Processes Hang

2008-08-18 Thread Magnus Hagander
Kim Robinson wrote: > > > Hi, > > I am using the npgsql postgres data adaptor in a C# ASP.NET application. > Each time the site establishes a new connection to the database a > postgres.exe process is started. For some reason this process is not > removed when the connection is closed. > > Any

[GENERAL] Postres.exe Processes Hang

2008-08-17 Thread Kim Robinson
Hi, I am using the npgsql postgres data adaptor in a C# ASP.NET application. Each time the site establishes a new connection to the database a postgres.exe process is started. For some reason this process is not removed when the connection is closed. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank