Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:54:56PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
Seems they are fast where it counts... namely getting a team of developers on
top of the contest so they come out shining. Too bad people in this
community don't see the value of paying people to do ad
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 16:48, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:54:56PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> >> Seems they are fast where it counts... namely getting a team of
> >> developers on top of the contest so they come out shining. Too bad
>
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:54:56PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
Seems they are fast where it counts... namely getting a team of developers on
top of the contest so they come out shining. Too bad people in this
community don't see the value of paying people to do adv
On Aug 30, 2006, at 16:11 , Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:54:56PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
Seems they are fast where it counts... namely getting a team of
developers on
top of the contest so they come out shining. Too bad people in this
community don't see the v
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:54:56PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> Seems they are fast where it counts... namely getting a team of developers on
> top of the contest so they come out shining. Too bad people in this
> community don't see the value of paying people to do advocacy related
> developme
On Monday 28 August 2006 17:04, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tony Caduto wrote:
> > http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/06/08/28/1738259.shtml
> >
> > Don't know the validity of this dvd order test they did, but the
> > article claims Postgresql only did 120 OPM.
>
> The contest evaluated the solutio
Scott Marlowe wrote:
Was this all the same basic task implemented by different teams then?
Yep.
Can we see the code? hack it? I'm sure someone here could help out.
Sure.
I don't care about the contest, but it would be nice to be able to put
out a version that could compete with MySQL's.
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 17:34, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > I'm wondering if the source code is available.
>
> http://www.heise.de/ct/dbcontest/teilnehmer.shtml
>
> > My guess is it was full of MySQLisms and the postgresql "port" was
> > written without indexes, no transaction
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 17:06, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Tony Caduto wrote:
> > http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/06/08/28/1738259.shtml
> >
> > Don't know the validity of this dvd order test they did, but the article
> > claims Postgresql only did 120 OPM.
> > Seems a little fishy to me.
>
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> I'm wondering if the source code is available.
http://www.heise.de/ct/dbcontest/teilnehmer.shtml
> My guess is it was full of MySQLisms and the postgresql "port" was
> written without indexes, no transactions, and relied on running
> dozens of queries that postgresql could
Tony Caduto wrote:
http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/06/08/28/1738259.shtml
Don't know the validity of this dvd order test they did, but the article
claims Postgresql only did 120 OPM.
Seems a little fishy to me.
Now, this article really s**ks! First of all, the original contest was
spec
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 16:02, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Tony Caduto wrote:
> > http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/06/08/28/1738259.shtml
> >
> > Don't know the validity of this dvd order test they did, but the article
> > claims Postgresql only did 120 OPM.
> > Seems a little fishy to me.
> >
>
Chris Mair wrote:
PS: this is, by the way a few months old, I'm wondering why MySQL
does the press release only now...
Because they don't have anything else to talk about, and are filling a vacuum?
Cheers,
NL
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: H
ony Caduto
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 4:33 PM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article
http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/06/08/28/1738259.shtml
Don't know the validity of this dvd order test they did, but the article
claims Post
In response to Chris Mair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/06/08/28/1738259.shtml
> >
> > Don't know the validity of this dvd order test they did, but the article
> > claims Postgresql only did 120 OPM.
> > Seems a little fishy to me.
>
> There was just one submi
> http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/06/08/28/1738259.shtml
>
> Don't know the validity of this dvd order test they did, but the article
> claims Postgresql only did 120 OPM.
> Seems a little fishy to me.
There was just one submission for PostgreSQL made by one guy who didn't
manage to finish
Tony Caduto wrote:
> http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/06/08/28/1738259.shtml
>
> Don't know the validity of this dvd order test they did, but the
> article claims Postgresql only did 120 OPM.
The contest evaluated the solutions sent in by whoever wanted to
participate. This doesn't prove any
Tony Caduto wrote:
http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/06/08/28/1738259.shtml
Don't know the validity of this dvd order test they did, but the article
claims Postgresql only did 120 OPM.
Seems a little fishy to me.
This has got to be a complete joke.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The Postgr
http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/06/08/28/1738259.shtml
Don't know the validity of this dvd order test they did, but the article
claims Postgresql only did 120 OPM.
Seems a little fishy to me.
--
Tony Caduto
AM Software Design
http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com
Home of PG Lightning Admin for
19 matches
Mail list logo
