On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 13:53, John Sidney-Woollett wrote:
> Bit more info (from my own findings migrating from Oracle -> Postgres)
> Jobs - NO, (but scheduled tasks can be implemented in other ways)
There is a project on gborg (or maybe pgfoundry) called pgjobs which
aims to create an oracle like t
Amen to that. I have to use Oracle at work, but I use PostgreSQL for
all my side stuff. Man do I ever miss psql when I'm in SQL*Plus...
On Aug 18, 2004, at 12:29 PM, Andrew Rawnsley wrote:
If you use it enough, I think it is inevitable that something,
sometime, somewhere will really honk you
o
If you use it enough, I think it is inevitable that something,
sometime, somewhere will really honk you
off about Oracle. With the feature bloat they're into these days, very
likely it will be something
you care nothing about that does it, too.
On Aug 18, 2004, at 2:08 PM, Ben wrote:
Is it just
Is it just me, or has there been a rash of "I'm thinking about postgres
and coming from an oracle background" questions recently? Was there some
writeup of postgres in a db rag in the last month or so?
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, John Sidney-Woollett wrote:
> Bit more info (from my own findings migrat
Bit more info (from my own findings migrating from Oracle -> Postgres)
Sequences - YES
Packages - NO (concept doesn't exist in PG)
Functions - YES, Procedures - NO (also no INOUT or OUT parameters)
Full-text - YES, tSearch2
Triggers - YES
Jobs - NO, (but scheduled tasks can be implemented in other
