Chris Travers writes:
> In another thread it has been mentioned that SQL language functions in
> 9.2 will accept named parameters
This is correct.
> and that you can't mix named and
> numbered parameters.
This is not correct. You can reference a parameter either by its name
or its number, same
2012/6/13 Chris Travers :
> Hi;
>
> In another thread it has been mentioned that SQL language functions in
> 9.2 will accept named parameters and that you can't mix named and
> numbered parameters. Can anyone confirm this? I am a bit concerned
> this will break a lot of LSMB stored procedures an
Hi;
In another thread it has been mentioned that SQL language functions in
9.2 will accept named parameters and that you can't mix named and
numbered parameters. Can anyone confirm this? I am a bit concerned
this will break a lot of LSMB stored procedures and that we won't be
able to support 8.
