Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes

Maybe add to it the insert/update data in tables based on an XML (a'la MS updategram) Balázs ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes

Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. > On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 02:57:44PM +0400, Ivan Zolotukhin wrote: > > So let's make such analysis here within PostgreSQL community! There > > were a lot of talks about XML support in Postgres, but they did not > > lead to any steady wor

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes

Ted Byers schrieb: May I ask a question about this? I will be working on an older database in which the original developer stored XML documents as a single variable length text field. To process it, it has to be retrieved in full and parsed. But the structure of it is simple in that it has

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other

"Ted Byers"

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes

On 3/29/06, Ted Byers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > May I ask a question about this? > > I will be working on an older database in which the original developer > stored XML documents as a single variable length text field. To process it, > it has to be retrieved in full and parsed. But the structu

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes

rward to. There is a reason I don't do much with XML even though I know how. Ted - Original Message - From: "Steve Atkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "pgsql general" Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 12:21 PM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL's XML

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes

On Mar 29, 2006, at 2:57 AM, Ivan Zolotukhin wrote: On 3/29/06, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ivan Zolotukhin wrote: BTW, are there any plans for its improvement? What are the first steps for the people who want to contribute to PostgreSQL in this field? The first step would b

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes

On 3/29/06, Ivan Zolotukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/29/06, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ivan Zolotukhin wrote: > > > BTW, are there any plans for its improvement? What are the first > > > steps for the people who want to contribute to PostgreSQL in this > > > field? > >

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes

On 3/29/06, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 02:57:44PM +0400, Ivan Zolotukhin wrote:> So let's make such analysis here within PostgreSQL community! There> were a lot of talks about XML support in Postgres, but they did not> lead to any steady work in this d

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes

On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 02:57:44PM +0400, Ivan Zolotukhin wrote: > So let's make such analysis here within PostgreSQL community! There > were a lot of talks about XML support in Postgres, but they did not > lead to any steady work in this direction. IMHO, it's time to start it > now, no? Quite, le

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes

On 3/29/06, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ivan Zolotukhin wrote: > > BTW, are there any plans for its improvement? What are the first > > steps for the people who want to contribute to PostgreSQL in this > > field? > > The first step would be making a detailed analysis of what "XML

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes

Ivan Zolotukhin wrote: > BTW, are there any plans for its improvement? What are the first > steps for the people who want to contribute to PostgreSQL in this > field? The first step would be making a detailed analysis of what "XML support" is supposed to mean. (You alluded to one use case, but b

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes

Hello, On 3/28/06, Merlin Moncure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anybody know good comparison/review article of XML support in > > major RDMBSes? I know that PostgreSQL's XML capabilities are quite > > weak, but how far is it from other products? > > Could you please desribe a specific exampl

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes

> Does anybody know good comparison/review article of XML support in > major RDMBSes? I know that PostgreSQL's XML capabilities are quite > weak, but how far is it from other products? Could you please desribe a specific example of what you would like to do and how you would not be able to do that

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes

On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:31:36 -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 05:22:40PM +0400, Ivan Zolotukhin wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Does anybody know good comparison/review article of XML support in major >> RDMBSes? I know that PostgreSQL's XML capabilities are quite weak, but >> how far

Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes

On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 05:22:40PM +0400, Ivan Zolotukhin wrote: > Hello, > > Does anybody know good comparison/review article of XML support in > major RDMBSes? I know that PostgreSQL's XML capabilities are quite > weak, but how far is it from other products? For other databases it's probably so

[GENERAL] PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes

Hello, Does anybody know good comparison/review article of XML support in major RDMBSes? I know that PostgreSQL's XML capabilities are quite weak, but how far is it from other products? Sincerely, Ivan Zolotukhin ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: exp