Re: [GENERAL] Post-Upgrade Question: 9.0.1 -> 9.0.3

On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Adrian Klaver wrote: My guess is you did a Postgres client only package install at some point:) Not consciously. When I upgraded from 8.4 to 9.0.1 last December everything moved from /var/lib/pgsql to /usr/local/psql. The build/install date on the executable /bin/psql ma

Re: [GENERAL] Post-Upgrade Question: 9.0.1 -> 9.0.3

On Thursday, March 10, 2011 8:11:37 am Rich Shepard wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Adrian Klaver wrote: > > Your psql binary is from 9.0.1 your server from 9.0.3. Somewhere you have > > the old psql in your path and it is being found first. > > Adrian, > >Found it. There was an executable /bin

Re: [GENERAL] Post-Upgrade Question: 9.0.1 -> 9.0.3

On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Adrian Klaver wrote: Your psql binary is from 9.0.1 your server from 9.0.3. Somewhere you have the old psql in your path and it is being found first. Adrian, Found it. There was an executable /bin/psql in addition to /usr/local/psql/bin/psql. I've no idea how the former

Re: [GENERAL] Post-Upgrade Question: 9.0.1 -> 9.0.3

On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Adrian Klaver wrote: Your psql binary is from 9.0.1 your server from 9.0.3. Somewhere you have the old psql in your path and it is being found first. Huh! Wonder how that happened. I moved /usr/local/pgsql/ to /usr/local/pgsql.9.0.1 and installed 9.0.3 into /usr/local.

Re: [GENERAL] Post-Upgrade Question: 9.0.1 -> 9.0.3

On Thursday, March 10, 2011 6:54:18 am Rich Shepard wrote: >After carefully following the instructions here: > > I tested the upgrade from the command line. My question is why I still see > a reference to 9.0.1; > > psql

[GENERAL] Post-Upgrade Question: 9.0.1 -> 9.0.3

After carefully following the instructions here: I tested the upgrade from the command line. My question is why I still see a reference to 9.0.1; psql (9.0.1, server 9.0.3) Type "help" for help. One database was created