On 8 September 2017 at 00:23, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Alban Hertroys wrote:
>>
>> On 28 August 2017 at 21:32, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:22 AM, Alban Hertroys
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> It's been a while since I actually got to
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Alban Hertroys wrote:
> On 28 August 2017 at 21:32, Jeff Janes wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:22 AM, Alban Hertroys
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> It's been a while since I actually got to use PG for anything serious,
> >> but we're finally doing som
On 28 August 2017 at 21:32, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:22 AM, Alban Hertroys wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It's been a while since I actually got to use PG for anything serious,
>> but we're finally doing some experimentation @work now to see if it is
>> suitable for our datawareh
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:22 AM, Alban Hertroys wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's been a while since I actually got to use PG for anything serious,
> but we're finally doing some experimentation @work now to see if it is
> suitable for our datawarehouse. So far it's been doing well, but there
> is a part
On 28 August 2017 at 14:22, Alban Hertroys wrote:
> This is on:
Just noticed I forgot to paste this in:
warehouse=# select version();
version
--
Hi all,
It's been a while since I actually got to use PG for anything serious,
but we're finally doing some experimentation @work now to see if it is
suitable for our datawarehouse. So far it's been doing well, but there
is a particular type of query I run into that I expect we will
frequently use
