On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 16:23 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > To be fair, he was running the cluster on a 100Mbps network. Depending
> > on his setup, that may have been his bottleneck. However, there's a good
> > chance that's not his only problem. Especially if he's so sold on MySQL
> > Cluster tha
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 16:08, Erik Jones wrote:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 15:44, Erik Jones wrote:
> >
> >> Scott Marlowe wrote:
> >>
SNIP
> >>> Guess he's never heard of pgpool, slony, mammoth replicator, cjdbc, or a
> >>> half dozen other ways to get high reliabili
Jeff Davis wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 22:04 +0100, Mikael Carneholm wrote:
This link adds to the joy...
http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?25,93181,93181
So the most popular free "database" in the world is a lousy performing
product that accepts 'gabba gabba hey' as a valid timestamp. Someone
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 16:13, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 22:04 +0100, Mikael Carneholm wrote:
> > This link adds to the joy...
> >
> > http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?25,93181,93181
> >
> > So the most popular free "database" in the world is a lousy performing
> > product that acce
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 22:04 +0100, Mikael Carneholm wrote:
> This link adds to the joy...
>
> http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?25,93181,93181
>
> So the most popular free "database" in the world is a lousy performing
> product that accepts 'gabba gabba hey' as a valid timestamp. Someone
> please,
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 15:44, Erik Jones wrote:
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 15:04, Mikael Carneholm wrote:
This link adds to the joy...
http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?25,93181,93181
So the most popular free "database" in the world is a l
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 15:44, Erik Jones wrote:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 15:04, Mikael Carneholm wrote:
> >
> >> This link adds to the joy...
> >>
> >> http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?25,93181,93181
> >>
> >> So the most popular free "database" in the world is a lousy per
Scott Marlowe wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 15:04, Mikael Carneholm wrote:
This link adds to the joy...
http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?25,93181,93181
So the most popular free "database" in the world is a lousy performing
product that accepts 'gabba gabba hey' as a valid timestamp. Someone
On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 15:04, Mikael Carneholm wrote:
> This link adds to the joy...
>
> http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?25,93181,93181
>
> So the most popular free "database" in the world is a lousy performing
> product that accepts 'gabba gabba hey' as a valid timestamp. Someone
> please, give
This link adds to the joy...
http://forums.mysql.com/read.php?25,93181,93181
So the most popular free "database" in the world is a lousy performing
product that accepts 'gabba gabba hey' as a valid timestamp. Someone
please, give me a reason not to get cynical...
> -Original Message-
>
Quick follow up on this, the guy who ran this test retested with a much
newer version of MySQL and sent this message to the DBMail mailing list
today.
Ok, I just did the test on mysql 5.0.27. It took 73 seconds
to deliver the 1000 messages. So, it's a good bit faster
than 4.1.20's 95 seconds, b
The following appeared this afternoon on the DbMail list. As someone
replied the MySql used is old, and the newer one is faster, but then
8.2 is faster than the older Postgresql versions.
This was posted by:- "Justin McAleer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I figured I would go ahead and toss this out for a
12 matches
Mail list logo
