On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 01:44:19AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Or I could fire off all the queries simultaneously and hope
> > they stay in close-enough lockstep through a single pass
> > through the table to be able to share most of the IO.
>
> I have not tried this sort of thing, but right offhan
Steve Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm doing some reporting-type work with PG, with the vast
> majority of queries hitting upwards of 25% of the table, so
> being executed as seq scans.
> ...
> It would be really nice to be able to do all the work with a
> single pass over the table, execut
I'm doing some reporting-type work with PG, with the vast
majority of queries hitting upwards of 25% of the table, so
being executed as seq scans.
It's a fairly large set of data, so each pass is taking quite
a while, IO limited. And I'm looking at doing dozens of
passes.
It would be really nice
