=?iso-8859-1?q?Mart=EDn_Marqu=E9s?= writes:
> What really intriges me is that before the upgrade (I was using 7.4.7 and
> upgraded to 8.0.3, all Debian packages) this function worked OK, even though
> I see my mistake when programming it, but after switching to 8.0.3 I stated
> getting this err
El Lun 08 Ago 2005 12:49, Tom Lane escribió:
> =?iso-8859-1?q?Mart=EDn_Marqu=E9s?= writes:
> > I upgraded a couple of servers to 8.0.3 a few weeks ago, and just found
> > out that some of the PL/pgSQL functions ar not working as they did, even
> > more, they are giving errors.
> >
> > Did somethin
=?iso-8859-1?q?Mart=EDn_Marqu=E9s?= writes:
> I upgraded a couple of servers to 8.0.3 a few weeks ago, and just found out
> that some of the PL/pgSQL functions ar not working as they did, even more,
> they are giving errors.
> Did something change from 7.4?
You really have to give some details
I upgraded a couple of servers to 8.0.3 a few weeks ago, and just found out
that some of the PL/pgSQL functions ar not working as they did, even more,
they are giving errors.
Did something change from 7.4? Particularly, the use of RECORD? It looks like
RECORD doesn't like to get assigned a sing