On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 00:07, Joe Conway wrote:
> Write a Pl/Perl function that just does the syscall, and call it from
> PL/pgSQL. Similarly for complex string parsing, etc.
That would work if I could get the Pl/Perl function to return an array
or set of results, but this brings me back to the o
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Well, I wasn't the OP ;-). I thought Tcl had the capability, as it is
sometimes said to be the most advanced PL.
Nah, that would be PL/R ;-)
Joe
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an
Joe Conway wrote:
Christopher Murtagh wrote:
That would work if I could get the Pl/Perl function to return an array
or set of results, but this brings me back to the original problem
(unless I'm missing something obvious).
Sorry, I guess I didn't sufficiently understand the issue. I don't
reall
Christopher Murtagh wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 00:07, Joe Conway wrote:
Write a Pl/Perl function that just does the syscall, and call it from
PL/pgSQL. Similarly for complex string parsing, etc.
That would work if I could get the Pl/Perl function to return an array
or set of results, but this b
Christopher Murtagh wrote:
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 23:05, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Hello,
If you can code in Perl then pl/C wouldn't be a deep jump.
That might not be a bad idea. Haven't done much C programming since my
CS days, but I really loved it then.
Other than here:
http://www.pos
Christopher Murtagh wrote:
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 21:11, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
The fact that it is pl/pgSQL? Seriously though, I think that pl/pgSQL is
counter intuitive to some people and those of us who are coming from say a Perl
background are going to be much more proficient in using pl/Perl
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 03:00:34PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>Better start learning Tcl ...
> What are we torturing people now? Can plPython do this?
Well, aparently Tcl is not up to the task either, nor is plPython. At
least I can find no mention on the docs nor the source code. Can yo
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 23:05, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Hello,
>
>If you can code in Perl then pl/C wouldn't be a deep jump.
That might not be a bad idea. Haven't done much C programming since my
CS days, but I really loved it then.
Other than here:
http://www.postgres.org/docs/7.3/static
Christopher Murtagh wrote:
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 16:52, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Better start learning Tcl ...
Thanks for the info. I'm ok with that, I like Perl, but I can live
without it too. :-) Two questions:
1) Can Tcl return multiple rows?
3) ok, 3 questions... Any word on pl/php and a release
Hello,
If you can code in Perl then pl/C wouldn't be a deep jump.
J
Christopher Murtagh wrote:
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 21:11, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
The fact that it is pl/pgSQL? Seriously though, I think that pl/pgSQL is
counter intuitive to some people and those of us who are coming from
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 21:11, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> The fact that it is pl/pgSQL? Seriously though, I think that pl/pgSQL is
> counter intuitive to some people and those of us who are coming from say a Perl
> background are going to be much more proficient in using pl/Perl then having
> to learn
11 matches
Mail list logo
