Hi,
I have done a little work concerning the famous PL/Perl compilation Error and
also into Interfaces/Perl5.
The confusing POLLUTE option is no more used to see these parts compiled.
I thinks it's now fully compatible with all Perl versions, yes Tom I use PPPort :-)
The way to put it into the
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gilles DAROLD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> The problem is this will break on older copies of Perl.
>
> > This problem is solved by perl itself !
>
> Yeah, it is: there is a module called Devel::PPPort that isolates
> user C code from the incompatibilit
Gilles DAROLD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have take a look to the source code concerning PL/Perl, it seems that 2
>variables
have a bad call : errgv and na.
If you replace them by their normal call (in 5.6.0) PL_errgv and PL_na you will
>get
success to compile the lib
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Can you send me a patch?
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have take a look to the source code concerning PL/Perl, it seems that 2 variables
> > have a bad call : errgv and na.
> >
> > If you replace them by their normal call (in 5.6.0) PL_errgv and PL_na you will get
> > success to comp
Can you send me a patch?
> Hi,
>
> I have take a look to the source code concerning PL/Perl, it seems that 2 variables
> have a bad call : errgv and na.
>
> If you replace them by their normal call (in 5.6.0) PL_errgv and PL_na you will get
> success to compile the lib plperl.so.
>
> Also in
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alex Guryanow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [root@eaccess plperl]# perl Makefile.PL
>
> For recent Perl versions you need to do
> perl Makefile.PL POLLUTE=1
> instead. The src/pl Makefile would've done it that way for you,
> but it looks like that code patch didn't mak
Hi,
I have take a look to the source code concerning PL/Perl, it seems that 2 variables
have a bad call : errgv and na.
If you replace them by their normal call (in 5.6.0) PL_errgv and PL_na you will get
success to compile the lib plperl.so.
Also in Perl documentation you will find the answer f
