Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> That said, do you have to specify the library kernel32? If you use
> language "internal", doesn't that find it since it's already loaded?
This has come up before:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-06/msg00721.php
That particular thread died off wh
I hadn't considered that. Thanks.
Regards,
Shelby Cain
- Original Message
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
To: Shelby Cain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: pgsql-general
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 1:15:02 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PG_MODULE_MAGIC check in 8.2
That said, do
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 04:29:05PM -0800, Shelby Cain wrote:
> You are assuming I have the source for the library and although I've
> asked nicely via email Microsoft hasn't responded to my requests for
> the source code to kernel32.dll. ;)
I see, you're doing something rather unsupported...
> R
#ifdef PG_MODULE_MAGIC
PG_MODULE_MAGIC;
#endif
solves your problem
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
---(end of broadcast)---
T
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: pgsql-general
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 5:23:58 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PG_MODULE_MAGIC check in 8.2
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 02:46:41PM -0800, Shelby Cain wrote:
> Could someone give me some general hints as to what modifications I'd
> need to mak
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 02:46:41PM -0800, Shelby Cain wrote:
> Could someone give me some general hints as to what modifications I'd
> need to make in the 8.2 source tree in order to remove the
> PG_MODULE_MAGIC requirement for loading shared libraries into the
> backend? Is there any chance this
Could someone give me some general hints as to what modifications I'd need to
make in the 8.2 source tree in order to remove the PG_MODULE_MAGIC requirement
for loading shared libraries into the backend? Is there any chance this could
be made into a configurable option so the user can choose th
