Cott Lang wrote:
The higher-ups are attempting to force me to run Postgres over NFS at
least temporarily.
Despite giving me a queasy feeling and reading quite a bit of messages
advising against it, running Oracle over NFS with a NAS filer doesn't
seem to be unusual. Is there a reason PG would be
On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 07:37, Tom Lane wrote:
> No --- the issues are not with Postgres per se but with the reliability
> of your NFS setup. On top of the not-infinite reliability of disk drive
> hardware you now have to stack risk of failure of the NAS machine itself,
> network problems, and misc
The higher-ups are attempting to force me to run Postgres over NFS at
least temporarily.
Despite giving me a queasy feeling and reading quite a bit of messages
advising against it, running Oracle over NFS with a NAS filer doesn't
seem to be unusual. Is there a reason PG would be more sensitive th
Cott Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The higher-ups are attempting to force me to run Postgres over NFS at
> least temporarily.
> Despite giving me a queasy feeling and reading quite a bit of messages
> advising against it, running Oracle over NFS with a NAS filer doesn't
> seem to be unusual.
