Re: [GENERAL] PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag warnings

2011-08-13 Thread MirrorX
thx a lot for the answers we will upgrade to 8.4.8 and i will monitor the situation :) -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/PD-ALL-VISIBLE-flag-warnings-tp4692473p4697106.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via

Re: [GENERAL] PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag warnings

2011-08-12 Thread Tom Lane
MirrorX writes: > the last few days i have observed tons of msgs like the above on a db server > of ours. i have searched a lot on the internet but didn't find much relevant > information. > the server is 8.4.7. These are almost certainly not something to worry about. See this 8.4.8 patch: htt

Re: [GENERAL] PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag warnings

2011-08-12 Thread Adrian Klaver
On Friday, August 12, 2011 2:01:19 am MirrorX wrote: > i wiil provide some info in case it is helpful > > -the error msg is -> WARNING: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag was incorrectly set in > relation "summary_data" page 54 > (the same thing appears for many tables and many pages on each table) > > -in my

Re: [GENERAL] PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag warnings

2011-08-12 Thread Craig Ringer
On 12/08/2011 4:13 PM, MirrorX wrote: hello to all, the last few days i have observed tons of msgs like the above on a db server of ours. Please include the full text of the error from the server logs. the server is 8.4.7. i dont know what kind of information i could provide to you, in order t

Re: [GENERAL] PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag warnings

2011-08-12 Thread MirrorX
i wiil provide some info in case it is helpful -the error msg is -> WARNING: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag was incorrectly set in relation "summary_data" page 54 (the same thing appears for many tables and many pages on each table) -in my internet searching i found some cases where this issue was related

[GENERAL] PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag warnings

2011-08-12 Thread MirrorX
hello to all, the last few days i have observed tons of msgs like the above on a db server of ours. i have searched a lot on the internet but didn't find much relevant information. i read that this could mean some kind of serious data corruption, but didn't find more info in this direction. on the