Re: [GENERAL] Overhead of tables.

2000-12-06 Thread GH
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 09:34:19PM -0800, some SMTP stream spewed forth: > At 11:48 PM 12/5/2000 -0500, you wrote: > >Soma Interesting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'd like to get an idea of the overhead introduced by large quantity of > > > tables being hosted off a single PostgreSQL server

Re: [GENERAL] Overhead of tables.

2000-12-05 Thread Soma Interesting
At 11:48 PM 12/5/2000 -0500, you wrote: >Soma Interesting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'd like to get an idea of the overhead introduced by large quantity of > > tables being hosted off a single PostgreSQL server. It is possible I'll be > > wanting to host upwards of 200-500 tables per server.

Re: [GENERAL] Overhead of tables.

2000-12-05 Thread Tom Lane
Soma Interesting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd like to get an idea of the overhead introduced by large quantity of > tables being hosted off a single PostgreSQL server. It is possible I'll be > wanting to host upwards of 200-500 tables per server. Essentially, will I > be surprised to find