On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 23:39 -0400, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On Sep 14, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Russ Brown wrote:
> > We recently upgraded our trac backend from sqlite to postgres, and I
> > decided to have a little fun and write some reports that delve into
> > trac's subversion cache, and got stuck with a qu
On Sep 14, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Russ Brown wrote:
We recently upgraded our trac backend from sqlite to postgres, and I
decided to have a little fun and write some reports that delve into
trac's subversion cache, and got stuck with a query optimisation
problem.
Table revision contains 2800+ rows
Ta
Hi,
We recently upgraded our trac backend from sqlite to postgres, and I
decided to have a little fun and write some reports that delve into
trac's subversion cache, and got stuck with a query optimisation
problem.
Table revision contains 2800+ rows
Table node_change contains 37+.
rev is a '