On Nov 12, 2011, at 5:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jerry Levan writes:
>> On Nov 12, 2011, at 3:34 PM, Scott Mead wrote:
>>> The Makefile should be including the global did you try a 'make
>>> install' ?
>
>> I went back and did the make install from the dblink directory it installed
>> stuff
Jerry Levan writes:
> On Nov 12, 2011, at 3:34 PM, Scott Mead wrote:
>> The Makefile should be including the global did you try a 'make install'
>> ?
> I went back and did the make install from the dblink directory it installed
> stuff in the share directory but invoking dblink functions fai
On 11/12/11 10:02 AM, Jerry Levan wrote:
I have a mac running 9.1.1.
I then built dblink from the contrib directory and I did not
see an install option in the make file.
did you build this 9.1.1 or is this a standard distribution? if you
built it, did you install it with `make install` ?
On Nov 12, 2011, at 3:34 PM, Scott Mead wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Jerry Levan wrote:
> I think I have somehow botched my installation of 9.1.1 on Mac OSX 10.7.2
>
> I have a mac running 9.1.1.
>
> I then built dblink from the contrib directory and I did not
> see an install
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Jerry Levan wrote:
> I think I have somehow botched my installation of 9.1.1 on Mac OSX 10.7.2
>
> I have a mac running 9.1.1.
>
> I then built dblink from the contrib directory and I did not
> see an install option in the make file.
>
The Makefile should be inc
I think I have somehow botched my installation of 9.1.1 on Mac OSX 10.7.2
I have a mac running 9.1.1.
I then built dblink from the contrib directory and I did not
see an install option in the make file.
I tried copying the dblink.so file to the postgresql library directory
but i cannot figure ou