functions and stored procedures
Hi
2015-03-19 2:56 GMT+01:00 Tim Uckun
mailto:timuc...@gmail.com>>:
What do you guys do to namespace your functions so that they are not jumbled in
with the system functions and also somewhat hierarchically organized.
Obviously it's possible to create
2015-03-19 11:46 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule :
>
>
> 2015-03-19 11:03 GMT+01:00 Tim Uckun :
>
>> I guess I see schemas as ways to group data not functions.
>>
>> It would be very nice to be able to group your code into proper modules
>> though. It's something I really miss.
>>
>
> what is advantage mo
2015-03-19 11:03 GMT+01:00 Tim Uckun :
> I guess I see schemas as ways to group data not functions.
>
> It would be very nice to be able to group your code into proper modules
> though. It's something I really miss.
>
what is advantage modules?
Tim Uckun schrieb am 19.03.2015 um 11:03:
> I guess I see schemas as ways to group data not functions.
A schema is just a namespace.
The only "link" between data and a schema is that data can only live in tables
and a table is associated with a namespace.
Even if you use it to "group data", yo
I guess I see schemas as ways to group data not functions.
It would be very nice to be able to group your code into proper modules
though. It's something I really miss.
>>
Hi
2015-03-19 2:56 GMT+01:00 Tim Uckun :
> What do you guys do to namespace your functions so that they are not
> jumbled in with the system functions and also somewhat hierarchically
> organized.
>
> Obviously it's possible to create schemas for different namespaces but
> that can lead to a lot
nt: *Wednesday, March 18, 2015 6:56:55 PM
> *Subject: *[GENERAL] Name spacing functions and stored procedures
>
> What do you guys do to namespace your functions so that they are not
> jumbled in with the system functions and also somewhat hierarchically
> organized.
>
> Obviousl
I don't understand. What is wrong with having a schema which holds no data?
Schemas are cheap.
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Uckun"
To: "pgsql-general"
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 6:56:55 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] Name spacing functions and stored proc
What do you guys do to namespace your functions so that they are not
jumbled in with the system functions and also somewhat hierarchically
organized.
Obviously it's possible to create schemas for different namespaces but that
can lead to a lot of schemas which hold no data. The other way is to
s
