Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> FreeBSD (Stable releases only)
I suppose you meant stable _and_ releases? ;)
--
Alban Hertroys
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
magproductions b.v.
T: ++31(0)534346874
F: ++31(0)534346876
M:
I: www.magproductions.nl
A: Postbus 416
7500 AK Enschede
// Integrate Your World //
On Dec 13, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Markus Schiltknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John D. Burger wrote:
Sure, but they won't use PG either, for essentially the same reason,
since =all= PG support is "third party".
So one can debate if i.e. EnterpriseDB is providing third party
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 14:21 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think the real criterion for big companies is not so much whether
> you're supporting your "own" product as whether you're big enough to
> be worth suing if things go wrong.
This is a common misunderstanding and it is incorrect, at least in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/13/06 20:05, Gregory S. Williamson wrote:
> FWIW, there is a follow-up note on the original posting from a
> MySQL person:
>
> "we are just starting to roll out [Enterprise] binaries... We
> don't build binaries for Debian in part because the De
006 10:11 AM
To: Alvaro Herrera
Cc: David Goodenough; pgsql general
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] MySQL drops support for most distributions
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 12:01, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 10:50, David Goodenough wrote:
> > &g
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 13:20 -0500, John D. Burger wrote:
>> Surely there are also third-party companies that provide "support"
>> for MySqueal in some similar sense?
Yeah. HP for example [links below]. HP announced support
for Debian and MySQL (and the JBoss Stack as w
Tom Lane wrote:
The other point I'd make against John's argument is that there are a
whole lot of Fortune 500 companies buying Red Hat support, and RH is
effectively a third party for large chunks of Linux. (Of course,
there are also large chunks for which Red Hat employees write as much
code a
Markus Schiltknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John D. Burger wrote:
>> Sure, but they won't use PG either, for essentially the same reason,
>> since =all= PG support is "third party".
> So one can debate if i.e. EnterpriseDB is providing third party support
> for PostgreSQL or first-hand sup
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 13:37 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to "John D. Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > The good thing is that there are several companies supporting
> > > Postgres,
> > > so whatever one of them does it does not affect the market as a whole.
> >
> > Surely there are
Hi,
John D. Burger wrote:
Sure, but they won't use PG either, for essentially the same reason,
since =all= PG support is "third party".
Maybe. But at least these third parties can take the source and build
their own product on top of it, without significant limitations.
So one can debate if
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 13:00 -0600, Tony Caduto wrote:
> John D. Burger wrote:
> >
> > Sure, but they won't use PG either, for essentially the same reason,
> > since =all= PG support is "third party".
> >
> >
> They would probably use EnterpriseDB though :-)
Or Command Prompt like several extremel
John D. Burger wrote:
Sure, but they won't use PG either, for essentially the same reason,
since =all= PG support is "third party".
They would probably use EnterpriseDB though :-)
--
Tony Caduto
AM Software Design
http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com
Home of PG Lightning Admin for Postgresql
Yo
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Surely there are also third-party companies that provide "support"
for MySqueal in some similar sense?
Of course :) but... Fortune 2500+ for the most part will *not* use a
third party for support for something like MySQL.
Sure, but they won't use PG either, for essenti
In response to "John D. Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The good thing is that there are several companies supporting
> > Postgres,
> > so whatever one of them does it does not affect the market as a whole.
>
> Surely there are also third-party companies that provide "support"
> for MySqueal
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 13:20 -0500, John D. Burger wrote:
> > The good thing is that there are several companies supporting
> > Postgres,
> > so whatever one of them does it does not affect the market as a whole.
>
> Surely there are also third-party companies that provide "support"
> for MySqu
* John D. Burger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >The good thing is that there are several companies supporting
> >Postgres,
> >so whatever one of them does it does not affect the market as a whole.
>
> Surely there are also third-party companies that provide "support"
> for MySqueal in some simi
John D. Burger wrote:
The good thing is that there are several companies supporting Postgres,
so whatever one of them does it does not affect the market as a whole.
Surely there are also third-party companies that provide "support" for
MySqueal in some similar sense?
There probably are, b
The good thing is that there are several companies supporting
Postgres,
so whatever one of them does it does not affect the market as a whole.
Surely there are also third-party companies that provide "support"
for MySqueal in some similar sense?
- John Burger
MITRE
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 12:01, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 10:50, David Goodenough wrote:
> > > http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/13/1515217&from=rss
> > >
> > > "MySQL quietly deprecated support for most Linux distributions on October
>
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 15:01 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 10:50, David Goodenough wrote:
> > > http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/13/1515217&from=rss
> > >
> > > "MySQL quietly deprecated support for most Linux distributions on Octob
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 10:50, David Goodenough wrote:
> > http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/13/1515217&from=rss
> >
> > "MySQL quietly deprecated support for most Linux distributions on October
> > 16,
> > when its 'MySQL Network' support plan was replaced
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 10:50, David Goodenough wrote:
> http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/13/1515217&from=rss
>
> "MySQL quietly deprecated support for most Linux distributions on October 16,
> when its 'MySQL Network' support plan was replaced by 'MySQL Enterprise.'
> MySQL now
David Goodenough wrote:
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/13/1515217&from=rss
"MySQL quietly deprecated support for most Linux distributions on October 16,
when its 'MySQL Network' support plan was replaced by 'MySQL Enterprise.'
MySQL now supports only two Linux distribution
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/13/1515217&from=rss
"MySQL quietly deprecated support for most Linux distributions on October 16,
when its 'MySQL Network' support plan was replaced by 'MySQL Enterprise.'
MySQL now supports only two Linux distributions — Red Hat Enterprise Lin
24 matches
Mail list logo
