On 20/12/2003 18:04 Dave Cramer wrote:
I'm actually starting to write one of these for postgres, and apparently
there is another one in the works, from Thomas Hallgren.
There is at least one significant architectural issue here to deal with
Is it more desirable to have a single java vm and communi
John Sidney-Woollett wrote:
It means that you can create stored procedures/functions which reside in
the database that are written in java (as opposed to the native SQL
programming language).
Why would you want this? If you were more familiar with java than any of
the currently supported procedura
I'm actually starting to write one of these for postgres, and apparently
there is another one in the works, from Thomas Hallgren.
There is at least one significant architectural issue here to deal with
Is it more desirable to have a single java vm and communicate via RPC,
or some other mechanism?
On 20/12/2003 13:05 Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
On Saturday 20 December 2003 16:44, John Sidney-Woollett wrote:
> It means that you can create stored procedures/functions which reside
in
> the database that are written in java (as opposed to the native SQL
> programming language).
Does it mean mysql
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, Tony (Unihost) wrote:
> Can someone a little more clever than I (which means just about anyone
> on this list) tell me what the implications/benefits are of this are
> please?
>
> http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/03/12/19/1628241.shtml?tid=108&tid=126&tid=137&tid=1
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:05 am, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> Does it mean mysql got stored procedures? Wow..
>
> I would like to see details but since I don't know much details about
> either mysql or java, I can not describe it.
>
> Can anybody give a summary as in how much it takes mysql as far as
On Saturday 20 December 2003 16:44, John Sidney-Woollett wrote:
> It means that you can create stored procedures/functions which reside in
> the database that are written in java (as opposed to the native SQL
> programming language).
Does it mean mysql got stored procedures? Wow..
I would like t
On Saturday 20 December 2003 16:44, John Sidney-Woollett wrote:
> This would be a "nice to have" for Postgres too - I believe that it
> supports PL/pgSQL, PL/Tcl, PL/Perl, and PL/Python at present.
http://techdocs.postgresql.org/guides/PLLanguages
It is already supported..:-)
Shridhar
--
Sorry but I don't know what would be supported. Perhaps someone else can
provide more info.
Here is a document from Oracle detailing their java stored procedure support:
http://otn.oracle.com/tech/java/jroadmap/jsproc/listing.htm#998299
Hope that helps.
John
Tony (Unihost) said:
> Does this in
Does this include ALL the functionality of Java? Objects,
Polymorphism, Inheritance, or is it just a subset?
T.
John Sidney-Woollett wrote:
It means that you can create stored procedures/functions which reside in
the database that are written in java (as opposed to the native SQL
program
It means that you can create stored procedures/functions which reside in
the database that are written in java (as opposed to the native SQL
programming language).
Why would you want this? If you were more familiar with java than any of
the currently supported procedural languages, then it means t
Can someone a little more clever than I (which means just about anyone
on this list) tell me what the implications/benefits are of this are
please?
http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/03/12/19/1628241.shtml?tid=108&tid=126&tid=137&tid=156&tid=198
Cheers
T.
---(e
12 matches
Mail list logo
