On 12/13/2015 01:23 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 13.12.2015 21:14, Bill Moran wrote:
Wait ... this is a combined HTTP/Postgres server? You didn't mention that
earlier, and it's kind of important.
What evidence do you have that Postgres is actually the part of
this system running out of memor
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:23:19 +0100
Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 13.12.2015 21:14, Bill Moran wrote:
> > Wait ... this is a combined HTTP/Postgres server? You didn't mention that
> > earlier, and it's kind of important.
> >
> > What evidence do you have that Postgres is actually the part of
> > t
On 13.12.2015 21:14, Bill Moran wrote:
Wait ... this is a combined HTTP/Postgres server? You didn't mention that
earlier, and it's kind of important.
What evidence do you have that Postgres is actually the part of
this system running out of memory?
For me the complete picture doesn't look cons
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 20:09:04 +0100
Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 13.12.2015 18:17, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Gerhard Wiesinger writes:
> >>> Mem: 7814M Active, 20G Inact, 2982M Wired, 232M Cache, 1661M Buf, 30M Free
> >>> Swap: 512M Total, 506M Used, 6620K Free, 98% Inuse
> >> OK, but why do we then g
On 13.12.2015 18:17, Tom Lane wrote:
Gerhard Wiesinger writes:
Mem: 7814M Active, 20G Inact, 2982M Wired, 232M Cache, 1661M Buf, 30M Free
Swap: 512M Total, 506M Used, 6620K Free, 98% Inuse
OK, but why do we then get: kernel: swap_pager_getswapspace(4): failed?
Just judging from the name of th
Gerhard Wiesinger writes:
>> Mem: 7814M Active, 20G Inact, 2982M Wired, 232M Cache, 1661M Buf, 30M Free
>> Swap: 512M Total, 506M Used, 6620K Free, 98% Inuse
> OK, but why do we then get: kernel: swap_pager_getswapspace(4): failed?
Just judging from the name of the function, I would bet this is
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 16:35:08 +0100
Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello Bill,
>
> Thank you for your response, comments inline:
>
> On 13.12.2015 16:05, Bill Moran wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 09:57:21 +0100
> > Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> >> some further details from the original FreeBSD 10.1 ma
Hello Bill,
Thank you for your response, comments inline:
On 13.12.2015 16:05, Bill Moran wrote:
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 09:57:21 +0100
Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
some further details from the original FreeBSD 10.1 machine:
Mem: 7814M Active, 20G Inact, 2982M Wired, 232M Cache, 1661M Buf, 30M Free
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 09:57:21 +0100
Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>
> some further details from the original FreeBSD 10.1 machine:
>
> Mem: 7814M Active, 20G Inact, 2982M Wired, 232M Cache, 1661M Buf, 30M Free
> Swap: 512M Total, 506M Used, 6620K Free, 98% Inuse
>
>PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE
Hello,
some further details from the original FreeBSD 10.1 machine:
Mem: 7814M Active, 20G Inact, 2982M Wired, 232M Cache, 1661M Buf, 30M Free
Swap: 512M Total, 506M Used, 6620K Free, 98% Inuse
PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
77941 pgsql 5 20
10 matches
Mail list logo