On 20/05/11 17:33, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
> Craig Ringer wrote:
>>
>> category_id Record_id fields
>> 7821 {Village:adasrpur, SOI:media, Heading:CM dies
>>
>
> Yes , but slight modification , I want Village, SOI Heading as column
> names and adasrpur,media and CM dies their
Please reply to the list, not directly to me.
My reply follows.
On 20/05/11 14:47, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
> But Sometimes when I got stucked , I have no other option. Like I
> stucked from the past 4 days to solve the attached problem.
Sure. Sometimes you get stuck, and that's what mailing lists
On 20/05/11 13:00, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
> Thanks Craig,
>
> I spend some time on Memcahced and your explaination also helps.
> I think it is used only for applications where load is very high & users
> issue read only queries to the database.
Er, yes. You can't really cache queries that write to
Hi,
2011/5/18 Tatsuo Ishii :
>> How do you handle statements that rely on current_timestamp, random(),
>> etc? What about if their reliance is via a function? Is that just an
>> understood limitation of the cache, that it'll cache even queries that
>> don't really make sense to cache?
>
> Probably
> How do you handle statements that rely on current_timestamp, random(),
> etc? What about if their reliance is via a function? Is that just an
> understood limitation of the cache, that it'll cache even queries that
> don't really make sense to cache?
Probably we should cache the result of a quer
2011/5/17 Craig Ringer :
> On 05/17/2011 01:38 PM, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2011/05/17 14:31, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
>>>
>>> Rick Genter wrote:
On May 16, 2011, at 10:09 PM, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I need to research on Memcache in the next
On 05/17/2011 01:31 PM, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
At what stage we need memcached & what is the purpose of using it.
You might not need it. Depends on the nature of your app, its
performance requirements, how strict it is about always getting
consistent & current data, and how much money you have
On 05/17/2011 01:38 PM, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
Hi,
2011/05/17 14:31, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
Rick Genter wrote:
On May 16, 2011, at 10:09 PM, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
Dear all,
I need to research on Memcache in the next few days.
What I want to know is it worth to have memcahed enable in our
My
On May 16, 2011, at 10:31 PM, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
> Rick Genter wrote:
>>
>> On May 16, 2011, at 10:09 PM, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I need to research on Memcache in the next few days.
>>>
>>> What I want to know is it worth to have memcahed enable in our Mysql/
>
Hi,
2011/05/17 14:31, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
Rick Genter wrote:
On May 16, 2011, at 10:09 PM, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
Dear all,
I need to research on Memcache in the next few days.
What I want to know is it worth to have memcahed enable in our Mysql/ Postgres
Production Servers.
We have databa
Rick Genter wrote:
On May 16, 2011, at 10:09 PM, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
Dear all,
I need to research on Memcache in the next few days.
What I want to know is it worth to have memcahed enable in our Mysql/ Postgres
Production Servers.
We have databases from 20 to 230 GB and it's not the OLTP
On May 16, 2011, at 10:09 PM, Adarsh Sharma wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I need to research on Memcache in the next few days.
>
> What I want to know is it worth to have memcahed enable in our Mysql/
> Postgres Production Servers.
> We have databases from 20 to 230 GB and it's not the OLTP just a si
Dear all,
I need to research on Memcache in the next few days.
What I want to know is it worth to have memcahed enable in our Mysql/
Postgres Production Servers.
We have databases from 20 to 230 GB and it's not the OLTP just a simple
OLAP where data is fetched and stored in some meaningful for
13 matches
Mail list logo
