Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hanan Bentaleb schrieb:
>> It has been reported to me that the main problem encountered with former
>> postgresql versions is that when a process performs an update (of a
>> record in any table), the whole database was locked
> I wonder how they manage
Hanan Bentaleb schrieb:
> Hi Tino,
>
> Thanks for your response! I did not provide more specific technical
> details because I just came in to the project. So, I will try to provide
> as much information as I can.
>
> Former versions of postgresql used in this project are postgresql
> (starting a
Wildenhain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 12:54 PM
To: Hanan Bentaleb
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Management of Concurrent Clients
Hanan Bentaleb schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I am working on an application that involves mul
Hanan Bentaleb schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I am working on an application that involves multiple processes
> accessing and updating different databases: tables are split into 3
> different databases that are accessed by 3 different processes. This
> architectural decision was made in the past be
Hi all,
I am working on an application that involves multiple processes
accessing and updating different databases: tables are split into 3 different
databases that are accessed by 3 different processes. This architectural
decision was made in the past because it has been noticed that f
