On Feb 19, 2008 6:33 PM, Josue Gomes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/19/08, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Feb 19, 2008 1:16 PM, Josue Gomes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm just wondering why lib\ms\*.lib files are not part of
> > > binaries-no-installer distribu
On Feb 19, 2008 1:16 PM, Josue Gomes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just wondering why lib\ms\*.lib files are not part of
> binaries-no-installer distribution.
> Is there any specific reason they're not included there?
Everything is Microsoft-compiled now, so no need for special versions
Hi,
I'm just wondering why lib\ms\*.lib files are not part of
binaries-no-installer distribution.
Is there any specific reason they're not included there?
regards,
josue gomes
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, pleas
