Re: [GENERAL] Low values for cached size

2009-09-25 Thread Carlos Henrique Reimer
Hi Scott, The top and M option: top - 20:37:52 up 8:19, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Tasks: 96 total, 1 running, 95 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.5%id, 0.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM

Re: [GENERAL] Low values for cached size

2009-09-25 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Carlos Henrique Reimer wrote: > Hi, > > We're facing performance problems in a Linux box running CentOS release 5 > (Final) and PostgreSQL 8.2.4. I've done some basic checks in the > configuration but everything looks fine to me. One weird behaviour I've > found is

[GENERAL] Low values for cached size

2009-09-25 Thread Carlos Henrique Reimer
Hi, We're facing performance problems in a Linux box running CentOS release 5 (Final) and PostgreSQL 8.2.4. I've done some basic checks in the configuration but everything looks fine to me. One weird behaviour I've found is the cached size showed by the "top" and "free" Linux commands: top - 08: