David Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yup, and in practice you'd better have a lot less than that or assigning
>> a new OID might take a long time.
> What's a rough estimate of "a lot less"? Are we talking 2 billion, 3
> billion, 1 billion?
It's difficult to say --- the as
Tom Lane wrote:
David Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Since large objects use OIDs, does PG 8.3 have a limit of 4 billion
large objects across all of my various tables
Yup, and in practice you'd better have a lot less than that or assigning
a new OID might take a long time.
What
David Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since large objects use OIDs, does PG 8.3 have a limit of 4 billion
> large objects across all of my various tables
Yup, and in practice you'd better have a lot less than that or assigning
a new OID might take a long time.
> (actually, I presume OIDs
> a
Since large objects use OIDs, does PG 8.3 have a limit of 4 billion
large objects across all of my various tables (actually, I presume OIDs
are used elsewhere besides just large objects)?
Is there any plan on allowing large objects to support more than 2GB?
As data gets larger and larger, I c
