Hi:
I must have missed something, but how is it possible that a join on
tables A and B is faster (a lot faster) than a query to one of the
tables with the same conditions?
The problem seems to be with the query plan, in the case os a query to
table_a only, the planner executes a "Seq Scan", in
Hi Martijn:
Thanks for your answer, I really missed something ;-)
Kind regards, Ruben.
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 01:48:21PM +0200, ruben wrote:
Hi:
I must have missed something, but how is it possible that a join on
tables A and B is faster (a lot faster) than a
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 01:48:21PM +0200, ruben wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I must have missed something, but how is it possible that a join on
> tables A and B is faster (a lot faster) than a query to one of the
> tables with the same conditions?
>
> The problem seems to be with the query plan, in the ca