On 15.12.2005, at 9:10 Uhr, Brendan Duddridge wrote:
What about Sequoia? Is that better or worse than pgpool?
That looks interesting, I haven't seen it yet. Has anyone experiences
to share?
cug
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Hi Guido / Richard / Scott,
What about Sequoia? Is that better or worse than pgpool?
Thanks
Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE
Calgary, A
Hi Scott, hi Richard,
On 14.12.2005, at 17:30 Uhr, Scott Marlowe wrote:
This setup I'm talking about would have pgpool on each db server.
If you meant pgpool running on both application servers, that would
work
fine with slony in the background and pgpool in load balancing
mode, or
with p
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 10:29, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 10:19, Guido Neitzer wrote:
> > On 14.12.2005, at 16:46 Uhr, Richard Huxton wrote:
> >
> > > I'd be tempted to look at pgpool sitting between your application
> > > and the database, and then replication from the one machi
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 10:19, Guido Neitzer wrote:
> On 14.12.2005, at 16:46 Uhr, Richard Huxton wrote:
>
> > I'd be tempted to look at pgpool sitting between your application
> > and the database, and then replication from the one machine to the
> > other.
>
> Right, I thought the same, BUT:
Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 14.12.2005, at 16:46 Uhr, Richard Huxton wrote:
I'd be tempted to look at pgpool sitting between your application and
the database, and then replication from the one machine to the other.
Right, I thought the same, BUT: I have two application servers (one on
each mach
On 14.12.2005, at 16:46 Uhr, Richard Huxton wrote:
I'd be tempted to look at pgpool sitting between your application
and the database, and then replication from the one machine to the
other.
Right, I thought the same, BUT: I have two application servers (one
on each machine) connecting to
Guido Neitzer wrote:
Hi.
I have two server boxes (Apple Xserve G5). WebServers and applications
are installed on both machines, the load is distributed by a
loadbalancer to both machines.
How can I make a setup in a way that the database is also tolerant
against failure? What I actually nee
Guido Neitzer wrote:
Hi.
I have two server boxes (Apple Xserve G5). WebServers and
applications are installed on both machines, the load is distributed
by a loadbalancer to both machines.
How can I make a setup in a way that the database is also tolerant
against failure? What I actually
Hi.
I have two server boxes (Apple Xserve G5). WebServers and
applications are installed on both machines, the load is distributed
by a loadbalancer to both machines.
How can I make a setup in a way that the database is also tolerant
against failure? What I actually need is a mechanism th
10 matches
Mail list logo
