Re: [GENERAL] Ideal hardware configuration for pgsql/Netra

2001-05-03 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
GH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Somebody claimed that my post was uninformed...yet RedHat is all of Linux > now? No, of course not. Red Hat is more than Linux, Linux is more than our version of it: Red Hat Linux. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc. ---(end of broad

Re: [GENERAL] Ideal hardware configuration for pgsql/Netra

2001-05-03 Thread GH
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 12:52:24PM -0700, some SMTP stream spewed forth: > > It's sitting right here on my desk. Ask whatever you want. > > Yes they are better web servers than DBMS servers but if you > database is small enough to cache in RAM then who care if > the Netra uses slow disks? > >

Re: [GENERAL] Ideal hardware configuration for pgsql/Netra

2001-05-03 Thread Steve Wolfe
> Yes they are better web servers than DBMS servers but if you > database is small enough to cache in RAM then who care if > the Netra uses slow disks? > > All that talk on this list about Linux vs. BSD is silly. > Why bother when you can have Solaris 8 on SPARC hardware? Easy: Cost. (And,

RE: [GENERAL] Ideal hardware configuration for pgsql/Netra

2001-05-03 Thread Albertson, Chris
It's sitting right here on my desk. Ask whatever you want. Yes they are better web servers than DBMS servers but if you database is small enough to cache in RAM then who care if the Netra uses slow disks? All that talk on this list about Linux vs. BSD is silly. Why bother when you can have Sol