Hello,
I rarely post in this group, but felt input would be important to chime in
here from a security aspect.
One of the primary challenges I've seen in the past with migrating to
PostgreSQL from Oracle is implementing DISA STIG compliance. This may or
may not be a requirement in your environme
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:14:29 +0900
Michael Paquier wrote:
> You should be careful not to give ideas away. There may be enough
> funds to really create a high-tech-funky suit like that :)
> --
> Michael
Hackers has free time to spare in funky projects, Big Corps has free money to
spare in funky
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Andy Colson escribió:
>
>> I dunno. I'm new at conspiracy theories :-). I hoped, by some
>> stretch, Oracle was feeling the heat of competition from PG ... and
>> decided to "solve" the problem. See?
>
> If Oracle decided to solve the pr
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andy Colson escribió:
>
> > I dunno. I'm new at conspiracy theories :-). I hoped, by some
> > stretch, Oracle was feeling the heat of competition from PG ... and
> > decided to "solve" the problem. See?
>
> If Oracle decided to solve the
Andy Colson escribió:
> I dunno. I'm new at conspiracy theories :-). I hoped, by some
> stretch, Oracle was feeling the heat of competition from PG ... and
> decided to "solve" the problem. See?
If Oracle decided to solve the problem in these ways, I'm pretty sure
they would already have many
On 3/19/2014 12:33 AM, Jayadevan M wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Andy Colson mailto:a...@squeakycode.net>> wrote:
On 3/14/2014 6:08 AM, Antman, Jason (CMG-Atlanta) wrote:
I'm not a "high level committer", nor am I even a regular poster
to this
list.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Andy Colson wrote:
> On 3/14/2014 6:08 AM, Antman, Jason (CMG-Atlanta) wrote:
>
>> I'm not a "high level committer", nor am I even a regular poster to this
>> list.
>>
>> not saying this post is true, but... If I'm reading between the lines
>> correctly, this coul
On 12 March 2014 15:19, bobJobS wrote:
> I am currently working for the Government and there is a huge push to move
> our Oracle databases to a FOSS database solution. Right now, PostgreSQL is
> high on the list.
>
> What we need is a meeting/training session with the main contributors to
> Postg
On 3/14/2014 6:08 AM, Antman, Jason (CMG-Atlanta) wrote:
I'm not a "high level committer", nor am I even a regular poster to this
list.
not saying this post is true, but... If I'm reading between the lines
correctly, this could make for quite a striking headline in the tech
news - "NSA dumps Ora
I'm not a "high level committer", nor am I even a regular poster to this
list.
not saying this post is true, but... If I'm reading between the lines
correctly, this could make for quite a striking headline in the tech
news - "NSA dumps Oracle proprietary database in favor of PostgreSQL."
I'd v
On 3/12/2014 8:19 AM, bobJobS wrote:
What we need is a meeting/training session with the main contributors to
Postgres to help facilitate solutions of some of the Oracle functionality to
Postgres. This may be an opportunity to gather Government requirements for
additional Postgres releases. The m
Understood and I agree.
I will check to see how much contact detail I can divulge in an open forum.
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/High-Level-Committers-Wanted-tp5795695p5795729.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On 03/12/2014 09:43 AM, bobJobS wrote:
Your professional input is greatly appreciated.
My guess is you will get more assistance if you are more forthcoming
with information. There is also the issue of your email address,
*@yahoo.com is sort of generic to be charitable. At the moment all we
k
Your professional input is greatly appreciated.
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/High-Level-Committers-Wanted-tp5795695p5795720.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-ge
Two valid questions.
1. Columbia, Maryland
2. US Government
Attending PGCon does make sense, however I was asked specifically to see if
I could get someone for an onsite meeting.
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/High-Level-Committers-Wanted-tp5795695p579
On 03/12/2014 08:48 AM, Gary Chambers wrote:
Columbia the country or the District?
There's also the river...
And South Carolina...
Alright, I am going to go with the answer from Magnus:
".. in the Columbia area (any of them)..
--
G.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
--
S
On 3/12/2014 9:49 AM, alexandros_e wrote:
It seems like spam to me. Where is the guy's name or credentials? If I would
request something, I would sign with my name, government email and
telephone.
Or it is a 20-day-early April 1 email.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@
On 03/12/2014 08:38 AM, David Boreham wrote:
On 3/12/2014 9:34 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
Columbia the country or the District?
There's also the river...
Yea, and here me living in Washington State.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing lis
It seems like spam to me. Where is the guy's name or credentials? If I would
request something, I would sign with my name, government email and
telephone.
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/High-Level-Committers-Wanted-tp5795695p5795703.html
Sent from the P
Columbia the country or the District?
There's also the river...
And South Carolina...
--
G.
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On 3/12/2014 9:34 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
Columbia the country or the District?
There's also the river...
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
On 03/12/2014 08:19 AM, bobJobS wrote:
I am currently working for the Government and there is a huge push to move
our Oracle databases to a FOSS database solution. Right now, PostgreSQL is
high on the list.
What Government?
What we need is a meeting/training session with the main contributor
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:19 PM, bobJobS wrote:
> I am currently working for the Government and there is a huge push to move
> our Oracle databases to a FOSS database solution. Right now, PostgreSQL is
> high on the list.
>
> What we need is a meeting/training session with the main contributors t
I am currently working for the Government and there is a huge push to move
our Oracle databases to a FOSS database solution. Right now, PostgreSQL is
high on the list.
What we need is a meeting/training session with the main contributors to
Postgres to help facilitate solutions of some of the Orac
24 matches
Mail list logo
