> P.S. From previous posts, I'm starting to think that
> there is a VAST misconception that a single-threaded
> database engine (which is what Oracle was until some
> version 7 releases, I believe, called Oracle MTS
> appeared) can only handle ONE query at a time, and
> does
> not exec() a child
Thanks for the info!
Much appreciated!
Andy
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Mike Mascari wrote:
> --- Andy Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What scheduler are we speaking of here?
> >
> > Andy
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > > as for the processor, this will see an incr
--- Andy Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What scheduler are we speaking of here?
>
> Andy
>
> On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > as for the processor, this will see an increase,
> of course. note,
> > > however, that since PostgreSQL is _not_
> multithreaded, that it will run
> What scheduler are we speaking of here?
>
> Andy
>
> On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > as for the processor, this will see an increase, of course. note,
> > > however, that since PostgreSQL is _not_ multithreaded, that it will run
> > > only on one of the processors. (i'm abou
What scheduler are we speaking of here?
Andy
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > as for the processor, this will see an increase, of course. note,
> > however, that since PostgreSQL is _not_ multithreaded, that it will run
> > only on one of the processors. (i'm about to assume you ar
> as for the processor, this will see an increase, of course. note,
> however, that since PostgreSQL is _not_ multithreaded, that it will run
> only on one of the processors. (i'm about to assume you are using linux
> here... 'scuse me if i'm wrong) however, the good news is that you can
> encoura
hi...
> 128 MB 100 MHz SDRAM
> AMD K6-2/300 CPU
> 10 GB 7200RPM 9.0ms IBM IDE HDD
>
> It will, over the next few months, as money becomes available, be upgraded to:
>
> 256 MB 100 MHz SDRAM
> Dual Athlon 500 CPUs
> 10 GB UltraII Wide SCSI drive
>
> The database will contain several million rec
> Hi
>
> I am about to upgrade a server that is about to be running a large and busy
> postgresql database
> currently it has
>
> 128 MB 100 MHz SDRAM
> AMD K6-2/300 CPU
> 10 GB 7200RPM 9.0ms IBM IDE HDD
>
> It will, over the next few months, as money becomes available, be upgraded to:
>
> 25
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Michael wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am about to upgrade a server that is about to be running a large and busy
> postgresql database
> currently it has
>
> 128 MB 100 MHz SDRAM
> AMD K6-2/300 CPU
> 10 GB 7200RPM 9.0ms IBM IDE HDD
>
>From experience I'd say the biggest performance i
if in doubt, memory first -- although it depends your app and hits.
processor/disk: check your cpu use.
amy
>From: Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [GENERAL] Hardware optimising
>Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 11:19:39 +010
Hi
I am about to upgrade a server that is about to be running a large and busy
postgresql database
currently it has
128 MB 100 MHz SDRAM
AMD K6-2/300 CPU
10 GB 7200RPM 9.0ms IBM IDE HDD
It will, over the next few months, as money becomes available, be upgraded to:
256 MB 100 MHz SDRAM
Dual At
11 matches
Mail list logo
