Hi!
> "Poul" == Poul L Christiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Poul> It would be interesting to see how well PostgreSQL performed when it was
Poul> tuned.
Poul> Or has it allready been tuned?
Yes, it was. According to Ned, they did run vacuum() on the tables
before running the test and
See http://www.greatbridge.com/news/p_081620001.html - we increased the
cache, ran a vacuum analyze, a few minor things.
Regards,
Ned
"Poul L. Christiansen" wrote:
> It would be interesting to see how well PostgreSQL performed when it was
> tuned.
>
> Or has it allready been tuned?
>
> Ned Lill
It would be interesting to see how well PostgreSQL performed when it was
tuned.
Or has it allready been tuned?
Ned Lilly wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We posted the following announcement on our website today, at
> http://www.greatbridge.com/news/press.html.
>
> Please feel free to email me off-list with
Folks,
We posted the following announcement on our website today, at
http://www.greatbridge.com/news/press.html.
Please feel free to email me off-list with any questions.
Thanks,
Ned
UPDATE, August 22, 2000:
MySQL performance improves with tuning suggestions from development
team;
PostgreSQ
