Tom Lane Wrote in message:
> Marti Raudsepp writes:
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Ilya I. Ashchepkov
>> wrote:
>>> I wrote a function and during testing it I came across the strange
>>> behaviour.
>>> Function runtime is about 200ms first 5 times, 6th and futher calls takes
>>> ~22000 ms
Marti Raudsepp writes:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Ilya I. Ashchepkov wrote:
>> I wrote a function and during testing it I came across the strange
>> behaviour.
>> Function runtime is about 200ms first 5 times, 6th and futher calls takes
>> ~22000 ms.
>> I simplified my schema, you can se
Marti Raudsepp Wrote in message:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Ilya I. Ashchepkov wrote:
>> I wrote a function and during testing it I came across the strange
>> behaviour.
>> Function runtime is about 200ms first 5 times, 6th and futher calls takes
>> ~22000 ms.
>> I simplified my
Hi
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Ilya I. Ashchepkov wrote:
> I wrote a function and during testing it I came across the strange
> behaviour.
> Function runtime is about 200ms first 5 times, 6th and futher calls takes
> ~22000 ms.
> I simplified my schema, you can see it in attached file.
> I'
Hi, all.
I wrote a function and during testing it I came across the strange
behaviour.
Function runtime is about 200ms first 5 times, 6th and futher calls takes
~22000 ms.
I simplified my schema, you can see it in attached file.
I've tested on 9.4beta3 and 9.3.5.
When I removed security_barrier f
