On May 31, 12:11 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Other than the fact that no space may need to be reclaimed is anyone
> > aware of any circumstance - e.g. use of numeric data types - where a
> > full vacuum will simply not reclaim space?
>
> There are several
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Other than the fact that no space may need to be reclaimed is anyone
> aware of any circumstance - e.g. use of numeric data types - where a
> full vacuum will simply not reclaim space?
There are several corner cases where the code will abandon shrinking.
What are you co
Other than the fact that no space may need to be reclaimed is anyone
aware of any circumstance - e.g. use of numeric data types - where a
full vacuum will simply not reclaim space?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free s
On 30.05.2007 14:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other than the fact that no space may need to be reclaimed is anyone
aware of any circumstance - e.g. use of numeric data types - where a
full vacuum will simply not reclaim space?
- Idle transactions
- It doesn't heal index bloat, which might eat q
