On 1/4/08, CN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:20:41 -0500, "Chris Browne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> > > TODO already has:
> > >
> > > * Add optional textual message to NOTIFY
> > >
> > > This would allow an informational message to be added to the notify
> > >
On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:20:41 -0500, "Chris Browne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> > TODO already has:
> >
> > * Add optional textual message to NOTIFY
> >
> > This would allow an informational message to be added to the notify
> > message, perhaps indicating the row modified or ot
On 1/3/08, Chris Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> >> I am not sure if I am asking too much but does it make sense, and is it
> >> possible, to enhance NOTIFY that process "name/value" pair? Like this:
> >>
> >> NOTIFY "MyName=MyValue";
> >>
> >> With t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes:
>> I am not sure if I am asking too much but does it make sense, and is it
>> possible, to enhance NOTIFY that process "name/value" pair? Like this:
>>
>> NOTIFY "MyName=MyValue";
>>
>> With the capability of name/value pair, the listener will not have to
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
>
> > It is possible, that some notifies, if following in a very short time
> > frame, can get lost.
> >
> > In case we want to send extra text messages with NOTIFY, we should make
> > sure, that no notify get lost.
>
> Right. Currently, NO
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
> It is possible, that some notifies, if following in a very short time
> frame, can get lost.
>
> In case we want to send extra text messages with NOTIFY, we should make
> sure, that no notify get lost.
Right. Currently, NOTIFY acts like Unix signals -- consecuti
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
> > > With the capability of name/value pair, the listener will not have to
> > > check notification details by reading tables.
> >
> > TODO already has:
> >
> > * Add optional textual message to NOTIFY
> >
> > This would allow an informational messag
Hello,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:21:37 -0500 (EST) Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I am not sure if I am asking too much but does it make sense, and is it
> > possible, to enhance NOTIFY that process "name/value" pair? Like this:
> >
> > NOTIFY "MyName=MyValue";
> >
> > With the capability of name/value
> I am not sure if I am asking too much but does it make sense, and is it
> possible, to enhance NOTIFY that process "name/value" pair? Like this:
>
> NOTIFY "MyName=MyValue";
>
> With the capability of name/value pair, the listener will not have to
> check notification details by reading tables.
Dear developers,
With the existing single-notification-value mechanism, not only
SELECT'ing tables are necessary in some cases but DELETE'ing rows and
synchronizing the DELETE are also required in many cases where there are
multiple client connections to the same database.
As an example, supposin
10 matches
Mail list logo
