Keith C. Perry wrote:
Jan,
To continue the brain-dump. I was curious how the GC protocol was going to be
implemented (if you had any ideas thus far).
The stuff I've been kicking around so far is Spread 3.17.1 with a simple
self made Tcl/Tk binding library used from inside PG via PL/TclU. You
c
Jan,
To continue the brain-dump. I was curious how the GC protocol was going to be
implemented (if you had any ideas thus far).
Several years ago, I started working on a network security and intrusion
detection system for a client where the audit/logging system needed to be
redundant- they wante
>> I have been looking into how to ensure that synchronous replication, etc.
>> could best be implimented. To date, I see only two options: incorporate
>> the replication code into the database backend or have a separate "proxy"
>> which handles the replication.
>
> There are many problems with
Chris Travers writes:
> The easiest way of furthering the development of asynchronous replication
> proxies would be to break off the server-side network protocol handler into
> a library which would contain functions to bind to ports, listen, and pass
> messages back to the calling program. The
Hi all;
I have been looking into how to ensure that synchronous replication, etc.
could best be implimented. To date, I see only two options: incorporate
the replication code into the database backend or have a separate "proxy"
which handles the replication.
The main problem with incorporating
