Re: [GENERAL] Feature Request - Postgres FDW

2012-08-07 Thread David Greco
Request - Postgres FDW David Greco wrote: > Surprised to see this isn't offered as a Foreign Data Wrapper- one to > other Postgres servers. People have been working on it. It seems quite likely to be included in the 9.3 release next year. -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-general m

Re: [GENERAL] Feature Request - Postgres FDW

2012-08-07 Thread Andreas Kretschmer
Kevin Grittner wrote: > David Greco wrote: > > > Surprised to see this isn't offered as a Foreign Data Wrapper- one > > to other Postgres servers. > > People have been working on it. It seems quite likely to be > included in the 9.3 release next year. That's cool ;-) Andreas -- Really,

Re: [GENERAL] Feature Request - Postgres FDW

2012-08-07 Thread Kevin Grittner
David Greco wrote: > Surprised to see this isn't offered as a Foreign Data Wrapper- one > to other Postgres servers. People have been working on it. It seems quite likely to be included in the 9.3 release next year. -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.o

[GENERAL] Feature Request - Postgres FDW

2012-08-07 Thread David Greco
Surprised to see this isn't offered as a Foreign Data Wrapper- one to other Postgres servers. I was attempting to replace some uses I have of dbilink, and found a couple places where I am using it to connect to Postgres. One is for pseudo "Autonomous Transactions"- a db link to the same postgres