Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote on 22.04.2009 20:26:
> > Yes, I can confirm I think pg_migrator will work for 8.3->8.4 upgrades;
> > I start testing this week.
> >
> This is pretty good news, cool.
>
> Will there be Windows binaries for the pg_migrator once that 8.4 ships?
Uh, no i
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> I still wonder why the one-click installer is so much more prominent than
> the pginstaller.
Because it was designed to remove many of the complexities of the MSI
installer that most users don't need and many don't understand if
they're n
Bruce Momjian wrote on 22.04.2009 20:26:
Yes, I can confirm I think pg_migrator will work for 8.3->8.4 upgrades;
I start testing this week.
This is pretty good news, cool.
Will there be Windows binaries for the pg_migrator once that 8.4 ships?
Thomas
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list
Raymond O'Donnell wrote on 22.04.2009 20:14:
On 22/04/2009 19:05, Christine Penner wrote:
It was a zip file with an msi installer in it. I tried to find a similar
one for the update but all I could find was the one click installer.
The initial installation sounds like it was the pgInstaller, s
Looks like that's the one I got last time. They must have had that
one list on the main download page when I did the original install. I
wouldn't have looked in the ftp section.
Also when I looked in the ftp section earlier today, I skipped the
binary stuff because the one click installer I go
On 22/04/2009 19:21, Christine Penner wrote:
> The link below takes me to the same place I got this installer I'm
> having problems with. I am pretty sure I got the original installer from
Well, there are two installers listed there (at least, that's what I see):
* One-click installer, on Enterpr
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" writes:
> > RedHat/Cent/Fedora has long used the incorrect default of floating based
> > timestamps.
>
> Josh, you're being extremely unhelpful by presenting the problem in
> this narrow minded "correct" vs "incorrect" way.
>
> I'm going to go on the record no
The link below takes me to the same place I got this installer I'm
having problems with. I am pretty sure I got the original installer
from the Postgres web site just like I just did.
Christine
At 11:14 AM 22/04/2009, you wrote:
On 22/04/2009 19:05, Christine Penner wrote:
> It was a zip file
On 22/04/2009 19:05, Christine Penner wrote:
> It was a zip file with an msi installer in it. I tried to find a similar
> one for the update but all I could find was the one click installer.
The initial installation sounds like it was the pgInstaller, so. It
would be worth trying again with the sa
"Joshua D. Drake" writes:
> RedHat/Cent/Fedora has long used the incorrect default of floating based
> timestamps.
Josh, you're being extremely unhelpful by presenting the problem in
this narrow minded "correct" vs "incorrect" way.
I'm going to go on the record now that if Bruce gets pg_migrator
Christine Penner writes:
> Windows XP pro. I went to the postgres web site, downloads, clicked
> on the binary package and selected windows. It gave me a file called
> Postgresql-8.3.7-1-windows.exe
There are different people distributing Postgres-for-Windows with
different build options. You
It was a zip file with an msi installer in it. I tried to find a
similar one for the update but all I could find was the one click installer.
Christine
At 11:00 AM 22/04/2009, you wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote on 22.04.2009 19:34:
Huh, I wonder when the windows package changed its defaults.
On 22/04/2009 19:00, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Could it be that Christine initially installed the pginstaller version,
> and now downloaded the EnterpriseDB installer? And EnterpriseDB compiles
> with a different default setting?
>
> As far as I recall the .exe is the EnterpriseDB One-Click-Instal
Joshua D. Drake wrote on 22.04.2009 19:34:
Huh, I wonder when the windows package changed its defaults.
Could it be that Christine initially installed the pginstaller version, and now
downloaded the EnterpriseDB installer? And EnterpriseDB compiles with a
different default setting?
As far a
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 10:31 -0700, Christine Penner wrote:
> Windows XP pro. I went to the postgres web site, downloads, clicked
> on the binary package and selected windows. It gave me a file called
> Postgresql-8.3.7-1-windows.exe
>
> When I run that I hit next for the postgres directory, then
Windows XP pro. I went to the postgres web site, downloads, clicked
on the binary package and selected windows. It gave me a file called
Postgresql-8.3.7-1-windows.exe
When I run that I hit next for the postgres directory, then after
hitting next for the data directory I get the error. I kept
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 10:13 -0700, Christine Penner wrote:
> I am upgrading from 8.3.4 to 8.3.7. That's why I'm confused. The
> notes said I wouldn't have to do that. 8.3.4 was the original install.
What OS are you running? How did you go about upgrading?
Debian/Ubuntu will use --integer-datetim
On 22/04/2009 18:12, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 18:09 +0100, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
>> It sounds as if you're trying to get a later-version server to use an
>> earlier-version data directory - this won't work.
>
> Actually the error is about whether or not the server was com
I am upgrading from 8.3.4 to 8.3.7. That's why I'm confused. The
notes said I wouldn't have to do that. 8.3.4 was the original install.
Christine
At 10:09 AM 22/04/2009, you wrote:
On 22/04/2009 16:57, Christine Penner wrote:
> The existing data directory (Date/time settings: floating -point
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 18:09 +0100, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
> On 22/04/2009 16:57, Christine Penner wrote:
>
> > The existing data directory (Date/time settings: floating -point
> > numbers) is not compatible with this server (Date/Time setting: 64-bit
> > integers)
> >
> > I saw a few posts abou
On 22/04/2009 16:57, Christine Penner wrote:
> The existing data directory (Date/time settings: floating -point
> numbers) is not compatible with this server (Date/Time setting: 64-bit
> integers)
>
> I saw a few posts about this but I'm still not sure how to fix it. I
> think one of them said I
When trying to upgrade Postgres I got this message:
The existing data directory (Date/time settings: floating -point
numbers) is not compatible with this server (Date/Time setting:
64-bit integers)
I saw a few posts about this but I'm still not sure how to fix it. I
think one of them said I
Hey all,
When I try and install form the msi installer for version 8.2.4 I get
the following error.
Failed to run initdb: 128!
And when it tells me to see the logfile for details, there is no log
file in the tmp directory.
Anyone know why it's doing this?
It crashes furring the
23 matches
Mail list logo
